Columbine final report torrent

Search icon An illustration of a magnifying glass. User icon An illustration of a person's head and chest. Sign up Log in. Web icon An illustration of a computer application window Wayback Machine Texts icon An illustration of an open book. Books Video icon An illustration of two cells of a film strip. Video Audio icon An illustration of an audio speaker. Audio Software icon An illustration of a 3.

Software Images icon An illustration of two photographs. Images Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape Donate Ellipses icon An illustration of text ellipses. Columbine Movies Preview. It appears your browser does not have it turned on. This report is pure propaganda. Like the multi-tome Warren Commission report on the JFK assassination' the report's entire purpose is to cover-up all evidence contrary to the desired lone assassins conclusion.

What can't be covered up is omitted altogether or simply explained away as "misunderstandings by witness. There are 15 lawsuits pending over government actions or inaction at Columbine, and the report is careful to evade the specific facts or evidence that the plaintiffs need to bring government and police officials to justice. I've have waded through most of it and it is my opinion that the report is noteworthy not by what is in it, but by what is explicitly absent.

The report goes out of its way to paint a detailed scenario that gives the impression of completeness. It is easy to do since there are so many trivial details that can be used to obscure more important ones. The report describes the initial confusion and bewilderment of law enforcement on the scene, claiming there were too many agencies, too many conflicting reports, and not enough coordination.

That may sound plausible, and certainly explains why they would wait for a unified SWAT team to arrive for the actual assault. But after the SWAT team arrives fairly quickly' we are given no credible explanation of why they waited and waited to enter. This is something they are trained to do without pre-planning. The reader cries out for answers and gets none. The report doesn't even bring up the question directly. In the report's introductory remarks it uses a standard legal trick to justify its refusal to discuss details, saying this is still an "open investigation and "to preserve the privacy of witnesses who are not yet in the public eye, we have excluded certain names and details from this report.

What an understatement. There is only one reason those witnesses are not yet in the public eye--because the authorities don't want them there. Just like the manipulated results of the TWA investigation' over 80 witnesses to the missile attack were coerced and threatened into silence or into changing their stories.

Many student witnesses have reported identical treatment at the hands of federal and state investigators. Clearly every official had their marching orders: to gather evidence that only harris and klebold were involved in the columbine massacre. In May of Mark Taylor, a Columbine student injured in the shooting was still in the hospital. A friend came to visit and found Mark's mother rather upset.

She said her son was getting death threats--someone is threatening to finish off the injured students and the rest of Columbine. She also said that so many Columbine students know of other assailants being involved that she sees no way the truth about this could be covered up. That assessment has proven to be very naive. Quinn's initial conversations with the parents of the student, Chris Whisher, indicated they were clearly afraid and said they didn't want him talking to their son.

When Quinn called back to ask the parents another question' Chris himself answered the phone and seemed willing to talk.

Chris told Quinn' "They were just shooting everywhere" He added that the suspect who shot at his group was wearing a black coat, sunglasses and a BERET.

All the others who saw Klebold and Harris said they were wearing ear protectors and white and black T shirts, respectively. The surveillance cameras confirmed the T shirt apparel. Chris told him that lots of students saw other shooters--as many as 7 or 8 at one time. He said he knew personally of a girl who was coerced into changing her testimony by Sheriffs investigators, and made to say that she had only seen Harris and Klebold.

Quinn said Chris reverified that statement in another session and added that other friends of his had personally witnessed a group of individuals in trenchcoats, with weapons, shooting in a different part of the school simultaneous to Harris and Klebold firing weapons elsewhere.

Quinn asked whether his friend knew if some or all of these other shooters were students. He responded that only some were students. Chris himself told Quinn that he was later requestioned and pressured by investigators, who then tried to make a substantial effort to "help" Chris "understand how it may have only been Harris and Klebold" that he had seen at Columbine.

I reported last year in July how another witness was worked over by investigators to convince her that what she saw wasn't possible.

Columbine High School art teacher Patti Nielson' wounded in the school attack, made unwitting statements that cast grave doubts on the official two- gunmen theory. Teacher Nielson and student Brian Anderson observed and were shot by what she said was a "MAN outside the school on the upper terrace using a semi-automatic pistol. She said he was dressed in black and was shooting a gun toward the parking lot. She yelled at him to stop because she "thought he was doing a dumb thing.

Describing him initially as "small she later recanted upon being told by officials who the shooters "really were and said, "I thought he was small, but I found out later he was pretty tall! Despite all the harassment, there were numerous students who refused to be cowed by the pressure. The report tried to pass off these witnesses as an anomaly with this self-serving statement: "Despite the supporting evidence, both from ballistics and eyewitness accounts, that only two people, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, were the gunmen on April 20, , seven eyewitnesses remain firm in their account of another person with a gun that day.

Naturally' the report denies us the specific testimony of these holdouts. In fact, they weren't just saying there was ONE other person' but multiple shooters. I,m sure they would have an interesting rebuttal to this report--something like "I can count, can't I???